![]() |
|||||||
|
Civil Tiltrotor for the World Traveler |
||||||
| I. There is a need for an improved national transportation system for the long distance passenger | |||||||
I. There is a need for an improved national transportation system for the long distance passenger
Studies project large increases in the demand for air travel by the year 2000:
Among today's most congested airports are the ten busiest airports in the United States, which together handle a third of all passenger enplanements. Capacity shortfall airports are prime candidates for onsite vertiports. Yet only three runways will be added to these busiest airports before the turn of the century, and only one new airport is expected to be built (at Denver). The problems are the pervasive consumption of land, environmental impact, opposition to aircraft noise, and cost.
A major contributor to airport congestion is that many people are flying short distances on relatively small aircraft. The commercial tiltrotor aircraft can help reduce airport congestion and traffic delay problems by ---
|
|||||||
II. A Civil Tiltrotor Applications study was conducted(For further information refer to Civil Tiltrotor Missions and Applications: A Research Study, Summary Final Report -NASA CR 177452, study by Boeing Commercial Airplane Co., 7/87) Civil Tiltrotor Applications StudyIn 1983, an FAA-sponsored National Rotorcraft Program sought to identify improvements to the national interurban transportation networks and determined that conventional helicopters did not have the potential to satisfy requirements because of a lack of capacity, high operational costs, and high noise levels. Tiltrotors offered better potential to improve interurban air transport service. In 1985, FAA Administrator D.D. Engen proposed a joint civil tiltrotor study with NASA and DOD that would capitalize on development of the military V-22 tiltrotor and document the potential of the commercial tiltrotor transport market. Study Results:For the public at large, the tiltrotor offers improved service in terms of flexibility and speed while at the same time reducing the sound levels and possibly the number of aircraft needed to do the same work. Potential markets are identified as follows: High-Density Market. Airlines logged an average of 2000 hour of delays per day in 1986, up 25 percent from 1985. FAA predicts that the number of seriously congested airports will increase from 16 in 1986 to 58 by the year 2000. Tiltrotors could capture 1/3 to 2/3 of the high-density, short-haul air travel market. The key to tiltrotor acceptance is the reduction of portal-to-portal trip time, minimizing the time and expense of the ground segments of the trip, and avoiding time-consuming airport/ airway congestion. This requires the use of VTOL capability at one or both ends of the trip. The VTOL capability would allow passengers to begin and end their business trips near home, and to arrive at their metropolitan business destinations. Tiltrotor service will attract principally business travelers. Market penetration of the civil tiltrotor is dependent on the form of service made available to the commuter i.e. portal-to-portal, through-plane service, or connect-hub service. Another factor will be the number and location of vertiports. Corporate/ Executive Market. Tiltrotor offers great advantages in this market: operational flexibility, comfort, convenience, security, speed. Low Density/ Developing Region. A broad spectrum of opportunities exist. The low density market consists of such regions as southeast Asia, Oceania, Alaska, northern Canada, and the Caribbean. The lack of ground infrastructure is one commonality in this market. Opportunities could include tourists, light, high-volume industrial products, and foodstuffs. Governmental support of startup and operation is likely to be required. A "quick-change" capability (passenger to cargo to passenger) would add to market adaptability. There is also a potential market in low-density areas for resource development applications. Public Service Market. In the public service market, the customer is the general public, and the costs are borne by the community. Primary missions includes police and fire department support, medical transport, drug enforcement, Coast Guard search and rescue, and border patrol. Conclusions for the individual candidate markets:
Market Summary:
Technical Summary:
Infrastructure Planning and Development:
Potential commercial tiltrotor service offers these advantages:Over helicopters:
Over fixed-wing transports:
Vehicle Design Guidelines:
|
|||||||
III. Recommendations for use of the Civil TiltrotorTo develop a viable market not only the aircraft -- but an entire and cohesive tiltrotor transportation system --- is required. A national plan for action needs to be developed, one which considers all aspects of a transportation system. To the passenger on a portal-to-portal trip, the system needs to be perceived as accessible, safe, affordable, and convenient. Costs must be economically justifiable in terms of the value of time saved and the ease of making the entire trip. In terms of competition, the tiltrotor does not have the luxury of beginning at "square one". It will come into service in a sophisticated, highly efficient, and deregulated environment, the modern air transportation system. It must compete on its merits in this setting. Tiltrotor aircraft promises both a solution and a challenge. The U.S. leads this technology, but efforts outside the U.S. are also underway. Early U.S. development of a civil tiltrotor could create the benefits of a new industry and a new transportation system, but it carries risks: technical, operational, regulatory, and financial. The following elements of a national plan for action on the civil tiltrotor are recommended: Top of Page |
|||||||
Back to Tiltrotor Introduction Page |
|||||||
Back to Simulation Library |
|||||||
SimLabs Home | VMS Home | CVSRF Home | Photos | Library | VLAB | Contact Us | Copyright | NASA Ames
What's New | Quick Tour | NASA Aviation Systems
![]()
For additional information, please contact...
| Flight Simulation Laboratories Attn: Tom Alderete, Chief Simulation Planning Office NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 |
Flight Simulation Laboratories Attn: Barry Sullivan, Chief Aerospace Simulation Operations NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 |
|||
| or: | or: | |||
| email at Thomas.S.Alderete@nasa.gov Phone: 650-604-3271 Fax: 650-604-3952 |
email at Barry.T.Sullivan@nasa.gov Phone: 650-604-6756 Fax: 650-604-3952 |
This page is maintained by Bob Shipley and modified by Kathleen Starmer.
Site was updated: December 9, 2002